Actors $ Vs. Normal - Unfair or fair? -

I m just curious to know what you guys think. Celebrities earn more money, lots of money, for doing a movie--say a good movie. Probably the amount your daddy could get in three-four years or more. Why do the directors throw such a big amount of money to them? Acting only contains of looking good and being able to change your expression at the right words according to a script. Some other people who earn like 100,000$ a year have to do much harder things and yet, they STILL get paid less! They wouldn t reach a million until another ten years! So producers and directors pay alot of money for their films to be good, and if it is good, the movies grosses alot of money which goes back to them and the rest of the workers. It takes three-four months depending to make a movie, so basically actors get one million in such short time? The whole thing pisses me off because there are LOTS of other people who look good like them and work HARDER and yet...these actors who just have to stand before a camera while they let their little agent do their work still get paid more! I dont get it......:/ unfair or fair?explaain!|::::|Being an actor isn t always a piece of pie. There s the pressure of being a star (which isn t always TOO bad) and you have to have the talent. I know I can t act to save my life! Plus, movies make MILLIONS of dollars, so producers tend to pay more. Like Tom Cruise making $20 million per film. I do agree that some, if not most, actors are overpaid and are famewhores, such as Miley Cyrus for instance.|::::|I herd that Simon Cowell makes like 20 grand every minutes he is on American Idol....... I mean seriously it must be a really boring life to have all this money, I mean with that kind of money you would have probally done everything by now!!! If I had that kind of money I would at least give money to St. Judes!!!!!! People are greedy these days!!!!