Which movie defines quot;money grubbing sequilitis at its most patheticquot;? -

Home Alone 2 earned that particular quote but I can t help but think there s other sequels at least, if not more, deserving of that honor.|::::|Well, INDIANA JONES AND THE BLONDE WHO COULDN T ACT comes to mind. The 2nd Indiana Jones movie was really disappointing but, fortuntately, the 3rd made up for it. SPEED 2 was really awful. I was a bit disappointed with TRANSPORTER 2 but TRANSPORTER 3, now out in theaters, is really good. Hmmmm, I m going to have to give this one some thought... oh, yeah, all the SAW movies sucked; the only redeeming feature in JEEPERS CREEPERS 2 was that it was football players and cheerleaders being killed.|::::|All three Star Wars prequels: The Phantom Menace Attack of the Clones Revenge of the Sith I love the three original Star Wars films, but all of these films were exercises in mass merchandising and advertising spin offs. Everything was calculated to produce the maximum profit possible. The films themselves were almost inconsequential to the toys and cereal box adverts.|::::|My bad, I guess I didnt understand the question right off the bat. That question my friend is very easy. The upcoming movie quot;new moonquot;. The sequal to twilight. It wasnt even thought of, and now its coming out in a year. super weak.|::::|Any of the Speed sequels All of the Saw sequels after 2 sucked The newer Star wars movies that weren t part of the origninals Legally Blonde 2 The 3rd Matrix Dumb and Dumberer Grease 2 All of the Bring It On sequels|::::|Kill Bill ....It was one movie and they actually broke it into two movies for the sole purpose of making more money.|::::|Sandra Bullock sequels